It is 10:40 on a Sunday night. The document has been open for forty minutes. I have written eleven words and deleted seven of them. Tomorrow morning, I will publish nothing.
That Sunday, I closed the laptop telling myself I would get back to it next week. I got back to it six months later.
What I told myself
During those six months I had an explanation ready, and it had the advantage of being flattering: I had nothing interesting to say.
It was not true, and I knew it. I spent my days solving problems other people also had. I had strong opinions about my own trade. I even had notes, plenty of notes, scattered across three different apps.
The second explanation was more honest: I did not have time. Except I somehow found two hours to read everyone else's feed. Time was not the problem. The cost of starting was.
The third one, which I only put into words much later, was the right one: every post cost me the price of a first post. Nothing I had written before made the next one any easier.
The real problem: I always started from zero
Look at what someone posting once a week actually does. They open a blank page, look for a topic, look for an angle, look for a hook, write, doubt, reread, cut, publish. Seven steps, and the first four are the expensive ones.
A baker starting from scratch every batch, with no starter, no oven already hot, none of yesterday's movements, would make one loaf a month. That was exactly my situation.
What I was missing was not motivation. It was the starter: somewhere my ideas piled up instead of evaporating, and a starting point that was never an empty page.
That shift was the actual turning point. As long as I believed my problem was discipline, the only available solution was to blame myself. The day I understood it was a problem of method, there was finally something to fix.
What I changed, concretely
I came back with three rules. They are not spectacular, and that is exactly why they held.
I stopped looking for topics. I capture them. A sentence overheard in a meeting, a question a client asks me for the third time, something in an article that annoyed me. Three lines, never more, dropped the moment it happens. Looking for a topic on Sunday night is trying to remember. Writing it down on Tuesday is picking it up off the floor.
I decoupled writing from publishing. Write when you have material, publish when the timing is right: these are two different actions, and gluing them together is what makes Sunday nights unbearable. Now I write three posts back to back when the window is good, then touch nothing for ten days.
I accepted publishing average things. My most-read posts are almost never the ones I worked hardest on. The one I wrote in twelve minutes, slightly annoyed, outperformed the one I polished for two hours by a factor of ten. Perfectionism is not high standards, it is a comfortable form of avoidance.
There is a fourth rule, less flattering: I stopped checking my numbers every day. Publishing and then refreshing the page every ten minutes is the surest way to turn a habit into an anxiety machine. I look once a month, in batches, and I look for trends rather than accidents.
The habits that actually moved my visibility
Showing up regularly was necessary, not sufficient. Five habits moved the numbers, in this order of impact.
One idea per post. A post covering three topics covers none of them, and above all it leaves no memory behind. If you cannot sum up your post in one sentence before writing it, it is not ready.
The first line is a contract. Readers only see two lines before the "see more". They must promise something specific, not announce a theme. "Here are my thoughts on consistency" promises nothing. "I quit for six months, and I had the wrong problem" promises a story and a conclusion.
Answer every comment within the hour. This is the best effort-to-effect move on all of LinkedIn. Every reply is one more interaction on your own post, it pulls the person back into the thread, and it makes the next readers want to comment too. Publishing then disappearing is switching off your own post.
Comment on other people's posts more often than you publish. Three thoughtful lines under a post that speaks to your audience puts you in front of people who do not know you yet, and costs you nothing to produce. In my first months back, that counted at least as much as my own posts.
Stay in the native format. No outbound link in the body, no unreadable screenshot, no PDF where plain text would do. The link goes in a comment or at the very end. You can argue with the rule, you will not win against it.
None of these five habits requires any particular talent. They require being there, twice a week, for long enough.
If you write for a brand, a company or a team
The mechanism is the same, the traps are different. Three things I have seen work beyond my own account.
Faces travel further than logos. A company page works as a shop window and as proof, it does not build an audience on its own. Visibility comes from the personal accounts of founders, salespeople and experts. The page relays, humans carry.
The idea bank becomes collective. What saved me solo matters even more with a team: one single place where everyone drops recurring customer questions, objections heard in meetings, internal numbers that can be published. A company's support inbox is the best topic generator in existence, and it is already paid for.
A brand that writes like a press release reads like a press release. The first-person rule applies inside companies too: a post signed by a person, telling a real decision and owning what went wrong, will always beat a text approved by four departments. If a competitor could publish your post as is, it is doing nothing for you.
For a personal brand as much as for a team, the question to ask before publishing stays the same: could someone quote this post in a meeting tomorrow?
Why I ended up building Ego
For several months those three rules lived in a text file, a calendar reminder and a lot of willpower. It worked, but it rested entirely on me.
So I started coding the tool I wish I had had that Sunday night. Not a generator that writes in my place: I did not want to outsource my voice, I wanted to remove the blank page. Somewhere my notes and documents stay put, where what I have already written helps write what comes next, where I can prepare three posts in one sitting and schedule them.
It became Ego. I build it by writing and I write by building it, which is probably the only honest way to make a writing tool.
What to take away
If you have dropped off, chances are it is not a matter of willpower. Look at what the first move costs you: if writing a post always begins with an empty page, the problem is not you.
What I would apply this week, whether you write for yourself or for a brand:
- Open one single place for your ideas, and capture them in three lines the moment they happen.
- Write two or three posts back to back once a week, rather than one a day under pressure.
- One idea per post, and a first line that promises something specific.
- Block twenty minutes after each publication to answer every comment.
- Comment on other people's posts more often than you publish.
- Read your stats once a month, and look for trends, not accidents.
Six months of silence taught me at least that much.
Generate your LinkedIn posts with Ego
Try for free
